02
Who experiences it
- Toronto developers and general contractors
- Preconstruction and construction-logistics teams
- Traffic consultants and permit coordinators
Loading evidence file
Loading evidence file
Show developers what every metre and additional week of street occupation costs, then help them test changes before those costs are locked in.
The operational problem
Street-occupation cost is often calculated after staging decisions are substantially fixed. Drawings, schedules, permit assumptions and changing fee rules sit in separate tools, making the cost of one extra metre or week hard to see early enough to act.
Who experiences it
Current workflow
Interpret staging drawings and manually measure closure areas
Map phases to fee categories and occupation durations
Recalculate spreadsheets each time the sequence changes
Ask consultants to assess operational and approval feasibility
Compare scenarios after decisions have become expensive to reverse
Interactive product demonstration
This is a front-end product thesis built with synthetic local data. Interact with the controls to inspect the proposed workflow; it does not represent a deployed customer system.
✓ South hoarding shift appears buildable · ⚑ accessible pedestrian route requires consultant review · ⚑ city/TTC approval not assessed
All rates, geometry and savings are synthetic demonstration data. Calculated fees use the visible model; estimates remain hypothetical until technical feasibility and authority approval are confirmed.
What the proposed system does
Maps lane, sidewalk, bike-lane and TTC impacts by phase
Calculates fees from explicit area, duration and rate assumptions
Lets teams change closure geometry and timeline in one scenario
Separates calculated fees from estimated or hypothetical savings
Records approval dependencies and feasibility notes beside each option
Keeps a clear baseline so value is not overstated
Required customer data
Data availability, rights and quality are assessed before a live pilot is scoped.
Expected measurable outcomes
Produce a reviewable fee model tied to geometry, duration and published rate assumptions.
Target outcome: test cost before staging and sequencing are locked in.
Label estimated savings separately and subject them to feasibility and approval review.
These are target outcomes and pilot hypotheses. Baselines, thresholds and measurement methods are agreed with the design partner before work begins.
08 / 30 / 60 / 90
The scope increases only when the previous stage establishes that the data, workflow and economics support it.
01 / evidence gate
Audit one schedule, staging plan and permit package.
02 / evidence gate
Add a schedule importer, mapped occupation model and scenario comparison.
03 / evidence gate
Add approval workflow, weekly progress tracking and live project updates.
Typical price range
CAD $15,000–$25,000 audit
Typical live pilot: CAD $40,000–$75,000.
Prices shown in Canadian dollars, excluding applicable taxes and third-party data or licensing costs.Risks and limitations
11 / Design-partner intake
We are looking for operators who can test the product thesis against real constraints and help define what an operational version must do.
Discuss this project